Re: Streamlining fontconfig scanning

"Keith Packard" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.fonts.fontconfig
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Behdad Esfahbod <[email protected]> writes:

> We don't need more config.  We have enough ideas to get the performance
> boost while handling bad fonts if we decide to.  But I agree with Keith, I
> think we should just ship without blanks and deal with repercussions
> after.

Yeah, as I said, I don't recall any 'reasonable' fonts ever had
trouble. Of course, it's been a long time since I've not had the outline
scanning. Perhaps we should just survey fonts that people have available
today; I've got about 3300 font files on my machine to try; perhaps it
would be good to know how many of those are broken.

-- 
-keith

_______________________________________________
Fontconfig mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fontconfig
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 832 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEw4O3eCVWE9/bQJ2R2yIaaQAAABEFAlmNJxcACgkQ2yIaaQAA
ABHqShAAplt4C1bmIfMhhmTnlDYwsQFNxKkJ3i9NwNkl+fXugLmXgkBaiTos2xw5
44A0S+H8S6TRjPLSl76XxlQN512BUuVbzBKMGxHhBHCkORMKP75zYXusHgGb77ej
PHGSi3N94h01pQWSfGTMmr8nnwSrfvZzKPEXBSoygbfR2YuQ3Mp2unKFMEYlF+JP
XvZ1l+/aPRpF8rSTNlz4jZ21pkZItIeQOxR21FBcgSEc3yfpl8KXqWQWCA1QaqL1
459XLnixAEEf5s/iC1D7F6ggpjmbw1cTgUW95P/u25InhSHQzeo+bDtpeiqcG0aS
RjxX4JJ4ivX3mzix58NYUenGk8Wuw5jGH2hpBDWkEJWvK9GgWc1OdsH5n3tD8DmI
qou7wxd5am87WY8MlRjcb1QpIVKbxZB9XdNS5XG/VFgXd23PJaGAhtYsyky4sI0J
UX8QuG/QtN8wDn7lHrpV0e5zPIxU2b52mVk6Dzc7H+DTUibVBfS4rC5oqZTj6qC7
JIr8CYGVACaIO474mbx+6o6vn7YxsEFdM8cYIlhuOJtjvngBgjhgxWfVE8Z+m0JM
xK9mMeSb8oCxsH6sBw9oCmDnBDsVRitdRFtAM72T687efRMDBZh3Tce3UStd9ZK5
cJFI7MF/MUCPRka5KFRK1szZtYC2OkNMbK0bDTcoMj/3ftaKlOE=
=Ez7w
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.