Re: Streamlining fontconfig scanning
Behdad Esfahbod <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.fonts.fontconfig |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAF63+7WN1cma1-02VJ6-RRUdzJFECiTAUJJfKPVnUU6mtW=YNw@mail.gmail.com> |
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 8:40 PM, Keith Packard <[email protected]> wrote: > Behdad Esfahbod <[email protected]> writes: > > > We don't need more config. We have enough ideas to get the performance > > boost while handling bad fonts if we decide to. But I agree with Keith, > I > > think we should just ship without blanks and deal with repercussions > > after. > > Yeah, as I said, I don't recall any 'reasonable' fonts ever had > trouble. Of course, it's been a long time since I've not had the outline > scanning. Perhaps we should just survey fonts that people have available > today; I've got about 3300 font files on my machine to try; perhaps it > would be good to know how many of those are broken. Indeed. Just do fc-scan on your corpus with master and then with my branch, and diff the outputs. Time both runs as well, for comparison. Report what you find. -- behdad http://behdad.org/ _______________________________________________ Fontconfig mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fontconfig