Re: 0-size array marshaling ?
Jean Parpaillon <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.freedesktop.dbus |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, Le lundi 18 juillet 2016 à 09:15 -0700, Thiago Macieira a écrit : > On segunda-feira, 18 de julho de 2016 11:08:37 PDT Jean Parpaillon > wrote: > > Thanks for the tip. > > Answer is: always pad, even with 0-size array. > > Test code in attachment. > > I think I've fixed dbus-java code in > > https://github.com/jeanparpaillon/ > > dbus-java > > Would be glad to push into the right repository, but freedesktop > > one > > does not seem to be up-to-date (no 2.8 tag). > > You created that tag two weeks ago. No wonder that it's not in the > upstream > source. Why are you creating tags in a downstream repository? I understand it seems weird :) According to Debian (https://packages.debian.org/sid/dbus-java-bin ), there is 2.8 upstream tag somewhere and upstream website always point to freedesktop. I may be wrong but I haven't seen any 2.8 tag on freedesktop git. So I've cloned fdo git and applied the diffs between 2.7 (last tag on fdo) and upstream 2.8 according to Debian. I understand it's confusing and it could be really nice to ensure that dbus-java on fdo is up-to-date. Regards, -- Jean Parpaillon -- Open Source Consultant Director @ OW2 Consortium OCCIware Strategic Orientation Committee Chairman Research Engineer @ Inria -- Phone: +33 6 30 10 92 86 im: [email protected] skype: jean.parpaillon linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/jeanparpaillon/en _______________________________________________ dbus mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dbus