Re: 0-size array marshaling ?

Thiago Macieira <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.freedesktop.dbus
Message-ID <2179447.WldR55loPB@tjmaciei-mobl1>
On terça-feira, 19 de julho de 2016 10:41:09 PDT Jean Parpaillon wrote:
> I understand it seems weird :) 
> According to Debian (https://packages.debian.org/sid/dbus-java-bin   ),
> there is 2.8 upstream tag somewhere and upstream website always point
> to freedesktop.
> I may be wrong but I haven't seen any 2.8 tag on freedesktop git.
> So I've cloned fdo git and applied the diffs between 2.7 (last tag on
> fdo) and upstream 2.8 according to Debian.
> I understand it's confusing and it could be really nice to ensure that
> dbus-java on fdo is up-to-date.

As far as we know, it is. A quick check reveals that Gentoo, OpenSUSE and 
Fedora carry the 2.7 release as their latest, so they're not aware of a newer 
release either. I'd assume that Debian moved on to a fork without proper 
warnings...

Except that the Changelog shows:

> dbus-java (2.8-1) unstable; urgency=low
> 
>   * New upstream release (fixes some array serialization issues)
>  
>  -- Matthew Johnson <[email protected]>  Thu, 05 Aug 2010 19:48:13 +0000

Not the same email address, but the same name as the maintainer of dbus-java 
(now cc'ed).

Matthew, can you clarify? Where is this 2.8 release coming from?

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
   Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center

_______________________________________________
dbus mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dbus
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.