Re: No more module proposals - decisions need to be made
Brad Hards <[email protected]> Mon, 11 Oct 2004 06:44:54 +1000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.freedesktop.platform |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--===============1513169851== Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1153677.Dmz8Ege0N1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --nextPart1153677.Dmz8Ege0N1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 02:44 am, Daniel Stone wrote: > I think we should let this be satisfied by XFree86 4.0 or greater, > and/or any version of the modular xlibs tree. =C2=A0Any objections? Are they exactly binary compatible? Brad --nextPart1153677.Dmz8Ege0N1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBBaZ9LGwwszQ/PZzgRAsHiAJ95aBuHVZfrWYt2/ARPxr9kwVKUpQCfbL88 uvQyDHtX+wcldDeCkLGkicQ= =Mrr3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1153677.Dmz8Ege0N1-- --===============1513169851== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ platform mailing list [email protected] http://freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/platform --===============1513169851==--