Re: No more module proposals - decisions need to be made

Daniel Stone <[email protected]> Sun, 10 Oct 2004 16:35:39 -0700
Newsgroups gmane.comp.freedesktop.platform
Message-ID <[email protected]>
--===============0150166139==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="SqO8Hf1xXlNBrDgg"
Content-Disposition: inline


--SqO8Hf1xXlNBrDgg
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 06:44:54AM +1000, Brad Hards wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 02:44 am, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > I think we should let this be satisfied by XFree86 4.0 or greater,
> > and/or any version of the modular xlibs tree. ??Any objections?
> Are they exactly binary compatible?

libXrandr changed soname in 4.3, and I believe Xrender might've changed
in that time also.  The major libs (with the exception of Xaw, which now
has an Xaw8 tree to add to 6 and 7) haven't changed much, I believe.

--=20
Daniel Stone                                            <daniel@freedesktop=
=2Eorg>
freedesktop.org: powering your desktop                http://www.freedeskto=
p.org

--SqO8Hf1xXlNBrDgg
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBacdLcPClnTztfv0RAkN0AJ0cdLD+V4Jz58dxjIxcqLerdpxhFACfe8nr
n8MG7WKvfaaexGtde1e47fc=
=HhmW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--SqO8Hf1xXlNBrDgg--

--===============0150166139==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
platform mailing list
[email protected]
http://freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/platform

--===============0150166139==--