Re: u_int32_t vs uint32_t
Keith Packard <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.freedesktop.release-wranglers |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Around 16 o'clock on Aug 23, Alan Coopersmith wrote: > So what about just using CARD32 as the rest of the X code does to define > this portably? That sounds like where we are at this point with the limited abilities of imake to accomodate system variance. I wonder what the US version of this code did; it seems like it built and ran nicely on all of the standard platforms... -keith _______________________________________________ release-wranglers mailing list [email protected] http://freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/release-wranglers
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 228 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh version 2.3.1 11/28/2001 iD8DBQFBKrn1Qp8BWwlsTdMRAjd6AJ9fUvh+KqSTjWPQPtH29YEoYNWIMQCdFE7D p89Mb2DCqUl6pftJ/gtiol8= =npz8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----