Re: (no subject)

On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, Keith Packard wrote:

> For Xmuu, it's using a '.0' version number right now, so we can switch to
> libtool versioning without any problems.  Use '-version-info 1:1:0' (I
> think that's right) to generate libXmu.so.1.0.1 on Linux and libXmu.so.1.0
> on BSD.

This created .libs/libXmuu.so.1.1 using my hacked libtool. (It forces
version numbers to be the same for NetBSD and Linux.) I think it should be
-version-info 1:0:1 (which made .libs/libXmuu.so.1.0), but I need to test
on another system (or with normal libtool 1.5).

Also, how did you get or decide on the libXmu.so.6.2.1 and libXmu.so.1.0.1
version numbers?

And, I need to figure out the best way to have the xmuu.pc.in "Version:"
set. (Right now, it is wrong and set to PACKAGE_VERSION as defined by
./configure as defined by AC_INIT in configure.ac.)

> Can you get $(libXmuu_la_SOURCES) to work in libXmu_la_SOURCES?  That
> would leave just one copy of each source file name in the Makefile.am
> file, which seems like a feature.

Okay, that is done. Thanks.

   Jeremy C. Reed
   http://www.reedmedia.net/