Re: (no subject)

Around 16 o'clock on Dec 16, "Jeremy C. Reed" wrote:

> > --version-info 1:1:0

> This created .libs/libXmuu.so.1.1 using my hacked libtool. (It forces
> version numbers to be the same for NetBSD and Linux.)

Hmm.  The magic --version-number flag was added to libtool 1.5 precisely 
for this purpose; the libtool maintainers have a "better" plan for how 
--version-info works, and I'd like to just let that work as designed where 
possible.  Can you make sure the right .so filenames are generated with 
the stock libtool 1.5 release on both operating systems?

I'm also confused; if you look at the Xrandr Makefile.am, it uses 
-version-info 2:1:0 and generates libXrandr.so.2.0.1, that's why I thought 
-version-info 1:1:0 would generate libXmuu.so.1.0.1

> Also, how did you get or decide on the libXmu.so.6.2.1 and libXmu.so.1.0.1
> version numbers?

XFree86 generates libXmu.so.6.2 and libXmu.so.1.0; these new libraries 
should be ABI compatible with those.

-keith