Re: Composite and damage status

On Tue, 2004-05-11 at 06:18, Keith Packard wrote:
> Around 14 o'clock on May 10, Egbert Eich wrote:
> 
> > That's interesting to hear. I would have liked to see things getting
> > announced on mailing lists. Seems like there is still a lot missing
> > to call this a community :-(((
> 
> Ah, sorry about that -- I guess we'd chatted about this at the developers 
> conference and then in a few emails without making people more aware of 
> what was going on.  It's not a huge effort; he's stealing pieces of the 

hi keith,

I thought about sending a mail similar to the one sent by egbert a while
ago. While I am by no means a very useful member of the community (I
merely lurk around and try to keep up to date, in the hope that I can do
something one day), I find it very hard to follow the developement
around the X server and I have been unable until now to find the mailing
list where real discussion takes place. For example, a recent mail by
Jim Gettys refers to "discussions taking place" to decide on autotooling
issues although I never saw such a discussion on any of the xserver,
xorg and xlibs mailing lists.

Maybe it would make sense to put a pointer from the xerver wiki to the
real mailing list if there is one or to try to use one exclusively if
all these discussions take place privately.

regards,
Mathieu

> existing backing store code to do the transformation in a DDX-independent 
> fashion, which should mean Composite for all X servers.
> 
> Stuart Kreitman has been working on Damage/XFIXES already; I don't know if 
> he's committed those to X.Org CVS yet or not.
> 
> -keith
> 
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _______________________________________________
> xserver mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xserver
-- 
Mathieu Lacage <mathieu-mXXj517/[email protected]>