Re: composite manager thoughts

Jim Gettys <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.freedesktop.xserver
Organization HP Labs, Cambridge Research Laboratory
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Yes, but you can set an upper limit on the rate of updating,
going to a time based updating model, rather than going at a
rate faster than human perception and using more machine resources
than necessary.

There will, in effect, be a round trip involved, but you can
rate limit the round trips this way.
                         - Jim

On Sat, 2003-12-27 at 15:53, Keith Packard wrote:
> Around 6 o'clock on Dec 27, Jim Gettys wrote:
> 
> > I'm wondering if an X synchronization extension based 
> > implementation, even without vertical retrace, is a useful
> > alternative to use of XSync.
> 
> I'm not sure that solves the same problem; you really need to respond to 
> precisely the set of updates which have occured since the last painting, 
> and XSync ensures you do exactly that.
> 
> > It may be possible to do a single WM and compositor using
> > two connections, as well....
> 
> Yes, that occured to me as well, but you have most of the same 
> synchronization issues within a single program as between two, so we'll 
> have to solve them regardless.
> 
> -keith
-- 
Jim Gettys <[email protected]>
HP Labs, Cambridge Research Laboratory
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.