Re: 5.0?

--===============1853542014==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_23152_10287223.1151731047981"

------=_Part_23152_10287223.1151731047981
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

On 6/29/06, will guaraldi <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> Lyntin development has been pretty dead the last couple of years.  The
> web-site could use some tlc, it'd behoove the project greatly to switch
> from CVS to SVN, and there are a series of niceties that I'd like to do:
>
>   * help text indexing (nothing complicated--a frequency search is fine)
>   * module listing
>   * run Lyntin through cheesecake and nicefy the code
>   * maybe do some unit tests
>   * update the Lyntin documentation
>   * possibly do the work to fix the net module
>   * possibly investigate what would be involved for a Windows .exe
>
> I figured I'd check in and see what the status was and if there was
> anything else anyone was interested in.
>
> What're people thinking?
>
> /will
>

I think SVN is better. I also agree with all other points :)

By the way, can you think of some another wiki engine?

--
Eugene

------=_Part_23152_10287223.1151731047981
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

On 6/29/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">will guaraldi</b> &lt;<a href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>&gt; wrote:<div><span class="gmail_quote"></span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>Lyntin development has been pretty dead the last couple of years.&nbsp;&nbsp;The<br>web-site could use some tlc, it'd behoove the project greatly to switch<br>from CVS to SVN, and there are a series of niceties that I'd like to do:
<br><br>&nbsp;&nbsp;* help text indexing (nothing complicated--a frequency search is fine)<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;* module listing<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;* run Lyntin through cheesecake and nicefy the code<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;* maybe do some unit tests<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;* update the Lyntin documentation
<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;* possibly do the work to fix the net module<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;* possibly investigate what would be involved for a Windows .exe<br><br>I figured I'd check in and see what the status was and if there was<br>anything else anyone was interested in.
<br><br>What're people thinking?<br><br>/will<br></blockquote></div><br>I think SVN is better. I also agree with all other points :)<br><br>By the way, can you think of some another wiki engine?<br><br>--<br>Eugene<br>

------=_Part_23152_10287223.1151731047981--


--===============1853542014==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642

--===============1853542014==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Lyntin-devl mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lyntin-devl

--===============1853542014==--