Re: changes requesting for GCC 17 Release Criteria (secondary targets)
Janne Blomqvist via Gcc <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gcc.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAO9iq9GsbQ_gzPebzAnASYXv=t7EEHVm0B-7qU9ao-UZ1DCj6w@mail.gmail.com> |
On Tue, Mar 24, 2026 at 11:12 AM Rainer Orth via Gcc <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Dongsheng, > > thanks a lot for doing this. > > > ### Full Breakdown by Multiarch and GCC Major Version > > > > | Rank | Multiarch | Total | GCC 12 | GCC 13 | GCC 14 | GCC 15 | GCC 16 | > > |------|-----------|-------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------| > [...] > > | 8 | i686-solaris | 258 | 0 | 0 | 58 | 58 | 142 | > > | 9 | sparc-solaris | 258 | 0 | 0 | 58 | 58 | 142 | > [...] > > | 15 | x86_64-solaris | 67 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 67 | > > | 16 | sparcv9-solaris | 67 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 67 | > > Given those numbers and the fact that sparc-sun-solaris2.11 is already a > primary platform, I wonder if we should make i386-pc-solaris2.11 > secondary. Sometimes there are significant differences between SPARC > and x86 here (often in favor of x86, actually). My 2c as a bystander these days: If you're planning to add another solaris target as a secondary platform, please pick x86_64, as AFAIU none of the upstreams (Oracle or Illumos distros like OpenIndiana) support anything except sparc and x86_64. -- Janne Blomqvist