Re: Policy on use of LLM tools and bug fixes

Giacomo Tesio <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gcc.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Thomas,

On Sat, 25 Apr 2026 10:28:53 +0200 Thomas Koenig wrote:

> I think that patches which contain LLM-generated code need to receive
> special care from *reviewers*, as well (to be formalized how?)

To this aim, our corporate policy mandates inclusion of prompts in
commits containing LLM output (together with tool name and version).

Over time, this helped a lot developers here to build an effective
insight about the issues that might pass unnoticed.
Over time we also independently adopted a habit to isolate LLM output
into dedicated commits, that proved very useful during post-mortem and
unexpected-costs analysis (bugs, security incidents...).


Giacomo
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.