Re: Policy on use of LLM tools and bug fixes

Am 25.04.26 um 10:54 schrieb Giacomo Tesio:
> Hi Thomas,
> 
> On Sat, 25 Apr 2026 10:28:53 +0200 Thomas Koenig wrote:
> 
>> I think that patches which contain LLM-generated code need to receive
>> special care from *reviewers*, as well (to be formalized how?)
> 
> To this aim, our corporate policy mandates inclusion of prompts in
> commits containing LLM output (together with tool name and version).

That may be a good thing, or not.  Cluttering up commits is one concern
that I have. Also, for review, patches should speak for themselves.

I also do not understand how this helps with what you write below:

> Over time, this helped a lot developers here to build an effective
> insight about the issues that might pass unnoticed.

Best regards

	Thomas