Re: [LTO merge][0/15] Description of the final 15 patches
Diego Novillo <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gcc.fortran,gmane.comp.gcc.devel,gmane.comp.gcc.java.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 22:00, Joseph S. Myers <[email protected]> wrote: > You say "tested on x86_64". More detail is needed. Have you tested both Sorry, I completely spaced out and forgot to mention this. Various folks are testing the branch. I sent a request for testing the branch (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2009-09/msg00566.html). I'm using that thread to keep track of breakage that should be fixed before the final merge. > LTO-enabled and LTO-disabled configurations, making sure there are no > regressions in each case? Yes. Targets with no ELF support refuse to enable LTO and error out at configure time if --enable-lto is forced. There was a bug in some of the testsuite patches that Richi fixed. Diego.