Re: remote supporting 'swbreak' and 'hwbreak' ?

Found it in the gdb server sources: ';' was missing from the end.
I thought it was a separator, that shouldn't be there after last item.


On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 6:49 PM, Juha Aaltonen <[email protected]> wrote:
> If a remote 'agent' supports 'swbreak' and 'hwbreak', what's the
> correct "syntax" for T05-packet?
>
> And is 'hwbreak+' needed in qSupported response if only SW breakpoints
> and HW watchpoints are supported (not actual HW breakpoints)?
>
> I've tried 'T05swbreak" with and without single quotes around swbreak,
> and with and without colon, but gdb always complains about malformed
> packet.
>
>
> I'm using "GNU gdb (Debian 7.10-1) 7.10".