Re: remote supporting 'swbreak' and 'hwbreak' ?
Juha Aaltonen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gdb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAHR0xd65Oue5iLqrZmF7TSwZbSx7RaNa9Un70YGjXU1vXXwMyg@mail.gmail.com> |
Oh, and from the gdb server sources I also saw that 'hwbreak' only applies to HW breakpoints and has nothing to do with HW watchpoints. On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 12:39 AM, Juha Aaltonen <[email protected]> wrote: > Found it in the gdb server sources: ';' was missing from the end. > I thought it was a separator, that shouldn't be there after last item. > > > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 6:49 PM, Juha Aaltonen <[email protected]> wrote: >> If a remote 'agent' supports 'swbreak' and 'hwbreak', what's the >> correct "syntax" for T05-packet? >> >> And is 'hwbreak+' needed in qSupported response if only SW breakpoints >> and HW watchpoints are supported (not actual HW breakpoints)? >> >> I've tried 'T05swbreak" with and without single quotes around swbreak, >> and with and without colon, but gdb always complains about malformed >> packet. >> >> >> I'm using "GNU gdb (Debian 7.10-1) 7.10".