Re: Automatically fetching Build ID from remote libraries and resole them locally?

@Jan: You said

> > GDB 9.0 certainly does not use *Build-Ids from the 'remote'*,
>
> According to a test I have made now I agree. Maybe Gary Benson will suggest
> more.

did you talk about upstream or Fedora (with your patches) here?

I got GDB compiling with almost all Fedora patches included. Ready to test soon.

I encountered some headaches when cross-compiling, it seems you have an bug
with --with-rpm=auto (the default).
(thats the output following the lines 'if test "x$with_rpm" != "xno"; then')

+ test xauto = xyes
+ test xauto = xauto
+ LIBRPM=librpm.so
+ RPM_REQUIRE=false
+ DLOPEN_REQUIRE=false
+ LIBRPM_STRING='"librpm.so"'
+ printf '%s\n' 'configure:6650: checking specific librpm version'
+ printf %s 'checking specific librpm version... '
checking specific librpm version... + HAVE_DLOPEN_LIBRPM=false
+ save_LIBS='-ldl '
+ LIBS='-ldl  -ldl'
+ test yes = yes
+ :
+ printf '%s\n' 'configure:6656: error: in `/tmp/build/gdb/gdb'\'':'
+ printf '%s\n' 'configure: error: in `/tmp/build/gdb/gdb'\'':'
configure: error: in `/tmp/build/gdb/gdb':
+ as_fn_error 'cannot run test program while cross compiling
See `config.log'\'' for more details.' 6659 5
+ as_status='cannot run test program while cross compiling
See `config.log'\'' for more details.'
+ test cannot run test program while cross compiling See
'`config.log'\''' for more details. -eq 0
/tmp/build/source/gdb/gdb/configure: line 406: test: too many arguments
+ test ''
+ printf '%s\n' 'configure: error: 6659'
configure: error: 6659
+ as_fn_exit cannot run test program while cross compiling See
'`config.log'\''' for more details.
+ set +e
+ as_fn_set_status cannot
+ return cannot
/tmp/build/source/gdb/gdb/configure: line 295: return: cannot: numeric
argument required
+ exit cannot
/tmp/build/source/gdb/gdb/configure: line 305: exit: cannot: numeric
argument required
+ exit_status=2
+ echo

Am Mo., 6. Apr. 2020 um 14:53 Uhr schrieb Norbert Lange <[email protected]>:
>
> Am Mo., 6. Apr. 2020 um 14:16 Uhr schrieb Jan Kratochvil
> <[email protected]>:
> >
> > On Mon, 06 Apr 2020 14:08:55 +0200, Norbert Lange wrote:
> > > How do I read the list at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gdb/tree/master.
> > > Are all patches applied, or are the ones starting with 'gdb-6.6' only
> > > for that version?
> >
> > All of them are applied, in this order:
> >         https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gdb/blob/master/f/_patch_order
> >
> > Although I would find it most easy to just use some Fedora virtual machine
> > (when you do not run Fedora natively).
>
> I doubt that, given that I tend to use gdb via IDE, and that we
> currently internally distribute dev tools over a debian repository.
> Lastly, Ill have to build a gdbserver for the target also.
>
> >
> >
> > > An a different note, I dont know if you are a GDB maintainer,
> >
> > I am no longer.
>
> Ok, then sorry if I came across disgruntled (I am disgruntled but you
> certainly arent to blame)
>
> >
> > > but the topic should be the upstream version?
> >
> > This mailing list is sure about the upstream version.  Just saying the problem
> > is solved in Fedora version so the patches could be somehow imported.
>
> Thanks, gonna try applying them locally and bugging debian maintainers
> to add them.
> Upstream might take a while, from what it seems. If you can, please
> try if you can push those patches somehow.
>
> Norbert