Re: annotation issue with newer gdb's?

Joel Brobecker <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gdb.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> In older versions of gdb (at least until 7.11 which i'm using and
> possibly later) I see the following behavior when starting gdb and
> typing, 'b main'
> 
>     "\r\n\032\032post-prompt\r\n"
>     "Breakpoint 1 at 0x4006c0: file test.cpp, line 42.\r\n"
>     "\r\n\032\032breakpoints-invalid\r\n"
> 
> In GDB 9.1, I'm see the following,
> 
>     "\r\n\032\032post-prompt\r\n"
>     "\r\nBreakpoint 1 at \033[34m0x4006c0\033[m: file \033[32mtest.cpp\033[m, line 42."
>     "\r\n\032\032breakpoints-invalid\r\n"
> 
> You can see that the newline moved on the "Breakpoint 1" line
> from the end of the line (in older versions) to the beginning of the
> line (in newer versions).
> 
> This ultimately caused CGDB to misbehave.
> 
> Correctly working CGDB,
>     Reading symbols from ./main...done.
>     (gdb) b main
>     Breakpoint 1 at 0x4006c0: file test.cpp, line 42.
>     (gdb) 
> 
> Incorrectly working CGDB,
>     Reading symbols from ./main...
>     (gdb) b main
> 
>     Breakpoint 1 at 0x4006c0: file test.cpp, line 42.(gdb) 
> 
> Was this change to the annotations made on purpose?

I haven't followed development much, lately ( :-( ), but I don't
think so. This looks similer to:

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25190

That particular PR is reported as being fixed for 9.1, so it's
not the same problem, or the fix was incomplete.

Have you tried master, by any chance?

-- 
Joel
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.