Re: bugzilla keyword for beginner issues to work on
Richard Biener <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnu.binutils,gmane.comp.gcc.devel,gmane.comp.gdb.devel,gmane.comp.lib.glibc.alpha |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> Am 30.09.2025 um 08:27 schrieb Luis via Gcc <[email protected]>: > > On 29/09/2025 21:07, Andrew Pinski wrote: >> Hi all, >> As talked about during the GNU tools cauldron, the gdb and gcc >> keywords usage here are different but folks mentioned it would be a >> good idea to have the same between the 2 bugzilla instances. Right now >> gcc is easyhack while gdb uses good-first-bug. Both have issues with >> the naming of each. >> So I was thinking of a good name and came up with beginner-improvement . >> I know this is all bikeshedding but in this case since the 2 projects >> right now use different naming we have a good chance to come up with a >> good name in the first place. >> beginner-improvement has a few advantages, first it is about being a >> beginner to the project. How long someone can be a beginner is up to >> them; it does not need to be their first issue solving. And the idea >> of an issue being easy is also left behind; some of them might not >> actually be "easy" but a beginner can still solve it. >> Plus in many cases it is not exactly a bug but rather than an >> improvement that needs to be done so this new name removes that side >> of things. >> So in summary, beginner-improvement is my proposal for the new keyword. >> Thanks, >> Andrew Pinski > > Personally I'm fine with beginner-improvement. Would we need to go hunting for the old names to do the mass updates? I think it’s possible to rename keywords? Richard