Re: bugzilla keyword for beginner issues to work on
Dhruv Chawla via Gcc <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gcc.devel,gmane.comp.gdb.devel,gmane.comp.gnu.binutils,gmane.comp.lib.glibc.alpha |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 30/09/25 13:19, Sam James via Gcc wrote: > External email: Use caution opening links or attachments > > > Andrew Pinski <[email protected]> writes: > >> Hi all, >> As talked about during the GNU tools cauldron, the gdb and gcc >> keywords usage here are different but folks mentioned it would be a >> good idea to have the same between the 2 bugzilla instances. Right now >> gcc is easyhack while gdb uses good-first-bug. Both have issues with >> the naming of each. > > 'good-first-*' is what people tend to search for in other > projects. Having it aligned (and optimising for new contributors) makes > sense, I think. > >> [...] > > sam +1 to this. I feel like "beginner-improvement" and "easyhack" are harder to parse than "good-first-bug" or "good-first-issue" (which LLVM uses FWIW), and it is not immediately obvious to me what either of them mean. -- Regards, Dhruv