Re: Confusing filter result
George Wilmes <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.genealogy.gramps.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CADWiNGzaH2sadqOWdaphHxYS7Y-BYMiHBDZSpL4OgvozjUGDVA@mail.gmail.com> |
It's not the filter that's the problem, rather the use of "before" and "after". Check your Preferences to see what thresholds are defined. Probably they are set to 50 years, such that anyone who was already more than 50 years old at the time of the census, or who lived 50 years beyond it, would not be selected. On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 1:05 PM Harvey Nimmo <[email protected]> wrote: > I thought I could use the filter form simply to find out which > persons in my database should appear in the 1921 UK Census, i.e. who > was alive on 2021-06-19, so that I could go to, say, Scotlandspeople > and get their census data. > > It seemed logical to enter into the filter form Birth date = before > 1921--06-21 and Death date = after 1921-06-19 and Gender = any. Nothing > else. > > But the filter returned only a limited number of the people who > satisfied the filter criteria. Birth and death dates had been entered > correctly and completely for a number of other people who should have > been listed. > > Why is this not working as desired? I confirm that the birth dates are > not baptisms and death dates are not burials for the missing cases. > Some of these were people for whom I had already entered the 1921 > Census data. > > I never cease to get frustrated with the filter function.;-( > > Cheers > Harvey > > > > > > > > -- > Gramps-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gramps-users > https://gramps-project.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... -- Gramps-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gramps-users https://gramps-project.org