Re: Confusing filter result

Yes, you're right. Typo. Should be 1921-06-19.

On Tue, 2022-12-20 at 19:43 +0000, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Dec 2022 20:02:58 +0100
> Harvey Nimmo <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hello Harvey,
> 
> > It seemed logical to enter into the filter form Birth date = before
> > 1921--06-21 and Death date = after 1921-06-19 and Gender = any.
> > Nothing
> 
> I assume the 06-21 is a typo.  It should, of course, be;
>  before 19 June 1921
> 
> > Why is this not working as desired? I confirm that the birth dates
> > are
> > not baptisms and death dates are not burials for the missing cases.
> > Some of these were people for whom I had already entered the 1921
> > Census data.
> 
> The entered criteria (i.e both birth *and* death dates) mean that any
> person with only one of birth or death dates (or neither) will not be
> output.
> 
> Also, what George said about ranges for dates.
> 
> Beyond that, IDK.  
> 
> -- 
>  Regards  _       "Valid sig separator is {dash}{dash}{space}"
>          / )      "The blindingly obvious is never immediately
> apparent"
>         / _)rad   "Is it only me that has a working delete key?"
> Watching the people get lairy
> I Predict A Riot - Kaiser Chiefs
> 
> 



-- 
Gramps-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gramps-users
https://gramps-project.org