Re: Problems with importing GEDCOM file
Enno Borgsteede <[email protected]> Sat, 13 May 2023 18:12:33 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.genealogy.gramps.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Op 13-05-2023 om 17:09 schreef Bret Busby: > I have subsequently, posted a query there, asking whether, after three > years after the problem with the non-compliance with the GEDCOM > standard, resulting in the corrupted GEDCOM files being exported, was > raised, the problem would be fixed, to make the files exported, GEDCOM > files, that would be compliant with the GEDCOM standard. > > Apart from the problems caused by the exported files being corrupt, I > strongly believe that where something is purported to be compliant > with a standard, it should, necessarily, be compliant with that standard. I have the same beliefs, but discovered that it was quite useless to discuss those on-line, on their site. WikiTree was a mess from the start, with married and middle names, silly politics w.r.t. surname prefixes, which I ignored from the start, and lots of other things, like the biographies, which act like a garbage bin for everything that can't be stored in their data model, which is very primitive. And that was more than 12 years ago, and it hasn't changed since. And their Americanism hasn't changed either. -- Gramps-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gramps-users https://gramps-project.org