Re: protection vs. sharing
Ann Hitchcock <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gis.freegis |
|---|---|
| Organization | con terra GmbH |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
52°North is an open source software initiative, which provides a developer platform for open source software engineering in Geoinformatics. One of our main goals is to contribute to Geoinformatics research and to bridge the gap between open source and proprietary, i.e. commercial software. Our active participants develop software, i.e. computer-implemented methods, which can be used in any kind of open standards compliant environments (open source and non open source). Our software does in fact consume and produce data, but this is not restricted to state-collected geospatial data Our security services implement international standards for the authentication and authorization of data and services. They are software published under GPL and, as a result, are free and must be open source. It does not matter if our software processes free data/services or data/services requiring a fee – it does not restrict access based on money. It is up to the user of our software to do what he wants to do with our software according to the GPL rights. Of course it is legitimate and understandable to demand that public data be free of charge. But we are not only dealing with public data in Europe, there is a great deal of data produced by companies and even private persons. And there are many scenarios in which it is definitely legitimate to “protect” confidential data from unauthorized access. ”If for example I'm working with confidential data (like cancer or aids data) then I do need to make it protected data - its confidential and should stay that way but I need a way for distributed analysts to be able to share that data in a secure way.” (Ian) Or, for example, sharing sensitive data within an organization, in which only specific users/analysts from certain offices can access the data. Once again, this is not about free (without charge) data vs. data for a fee. As far as INSPIRE is concerned, criticism is legitimate of course. However, there is – at least in our opinion – a strong need to establish a Trans-European/Europe-wide standardized network for environmental data. There is an increasing demand for higher quality data, i.e. with greater precision/accuracy and up-to-date data. Update and quality management are important factors for data maintenance, but also create considerable operating expenses. In the days of governmental cutbacks, land surveying offices and town councils are not being financed 100% anymore and are being forced to contemplate business management issues. They will need to be increasingly creative about acquiring funding for their data. We see open source pragmatically and not merely as a question of belief. We do not perceive a conflict between free software and any kind of data. We search for pragmatic solutions - we build bridges. Nothing in the world is black or white, but rather grey nuances. -- Dipl.-Geogr. Ann Hitchcock con terra GmbH Martin-Luther-King-Weg 24 48155 Münster Germany Tel: +49 (0)251 7474 520 Fax: +49 (0)251 7474 100 email: [email protected] http://www.conterra.de http://www.52north.org _______________________________________________ Freegis-list mailing list [email protected] https://intevation.de/mailman/listinfo/freegis-list