Re: Re-organizing source tree regarding drivers?
"Kai Pastor, DG0YT via gdal-dev" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gis.gdal.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am 07.05.26 um 02:28 schrieb Even Rouault via gdal-dev: > I'm hesitating between: > > - putting all drivers below a drivers/ directory > > - or having drivers/raster/ , drivers/vector/ and drivers/mixed/ > > This later organization avoids a bit the issue of a monolithic > drivers/ with 250+ subdirectories (who knows if Windows might not > limit to 256 :-)), but it may involve moving code around when > something that was raster or vector only later gains the other > capability. A real (legacy) Windows limitation is not around 256 subdirs but around 260 characters in filepath, subject to tool capabilities. It still hits today in some cases. "drivers/" can make a difference. I tend to prefer the first option anyways. Kai _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev