Re: Re-organizing source tree regarding drivers?
Javier Jimenez Shaw via gdal-dev <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gis.gdal.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CADRrdKu2NucA39bwHRm2c5bvccJBnO1b9WZnE7Ee=dincaKc+g@mail.gmail.com> |
> > > > I'm hesitating between: > > - putting all drivers below a drivers/ directory > > - or having drivers/raster/ , drivers/vector/ and drivers/mixed/ > ... > I prefer having three directories. It makes more clear their behaviour and what they should support. A driver in `raster` directory doesn't have to worry about vector problems and vice versa. For mixed... well it is clear that has to deal with both. > > Thoughts? (I'm wondering how such a plan could be executed without > freezing all pull request activity in the meantime to limit conflicts, > although git might perhaps be smart enough to detect files moving around) > > Even > > -- > http://www.spatialys.com > My software is free, but my time generally not. > Highly recommend OxiGDAL if you want to live in the 21th century and cure > Bixonimania > > _______________________________________________ > gdal-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev > _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev