Re: Re: Feature suggestion: 2 times for "duration of task": optimistic and pessimistic

Mikael Hallendal <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnome.apps.mr-project.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
tis 2002-08-20 klockan 20.55 skrev info:
> sön 2002-08-18 klockan 21.33 skrev info:

> Concerning the switchable features:
> 
> I would find it great if the more advanced features of a product would be
> able to be switched off and therefore cant be seen in the Interface so that
> they don’t confuse the unexperienced user. As the user makes progress,
> additional features could be added to the user interface (menus, buttons,
> dialogs ….) through option configuration.

Yes, as said in an earlier mail (sent a few minutes ago :) we are
currently using plugins for this. So that when you first start it you
get something pretty basic. 

Then you can enable plugins which will give you more functionality in
the menues/dialogs.

> My suggestions were not ment for the near future. Just some thoughs for in
> what direction Such a Project might head and to whom it may be very usefull. 
> e.g. big Project groups with big projects.

Yes, we are planning features like this in the future. Though currently
we are two full time hackers working on it and one that hacks on his
spare time so development goes in a speed accordingly :)
 
> Very good. The way this is solved in MsProject is not a good one.

I haven't looked at the way it's done in Microsoft Project, but when I
do I'll keep it in mind. What is not good about it?

> It might be that you are trying to make MrProject very attractive to a
> certain type of users (like construcion companies). I could find companies
> which fit into this type of users and make them to pay for additional
> features they want in Mrproject because I can explain them why it is cheaper
> for them to invest into feature they need than into a new version of the
> projecmt management software they currently use.
> 
> So please tell me to which type of users you try to be so attractive that
> they cant resist.

As said, at least I don't think we are at that point to make this
distinction yet.

> I personally think that the real value of a software-development-team
> (propriety or open soure) lies not
> the source code, but the understanding of the needs of a certain group of
> users and being able to deliver them a solution which makes them more
> productive. This is what Apple and Microsoft are good at. It is almost
> impossible to understand the needs of all people needing project management
> software.

Agreed, this is where we need help from the list :)

Regards,
  Mikael Hallendal

-- 
Mikael Hallendal                [email protected]
CodeFactory AB                  http://www.codefactory.se/
Office: +46 (0)8 587 583 05     Cell: +46 (0)709 718 918
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.