Shall we drop support for older libgda versions?
Maurice van der Pot <griffon26-bCGDfOjggl9Wk0Htik3J/[email protected]> Thu, 24 Jul 2008 21:22:31 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.apps.planner.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
While looking into a bug in SQL support, I found (once more) that supporting older libgda versions (or rather 1.x, because I've never seen 2.x) is kind of a pain. I'd much rather drop support for libgda < 3.0.x than to fix planner bugs for all versions. Now libgda versioning is a bit strange. Here's what I know about it (gleaned from http://www.gnome-db.org/News): - 3.0.x is the current stable series - 3.1.x are unstable versions, that will lead to 3.2.x - 3.99.x is a release for which the code has undergone major rework - there's an upcoming 4.0 version I think 3.99.x is what is leading up to 4.0, but I'm not sure. In any case the stable version (3.0.x) is the oldest version I'd like to concern myself with. What do you think? Is it ok to rip out support for the older ones? Regards, Maurice. -- Maurice van der Pot Gentoo Linux Developer [email protected] http://www.gentoo.org Gnome Planner Developer griffon26-bCGDfOjggl9Wk0Htik3J/[email protected] http://live.gnome.org/Planner _______________________________________________ Planner-dev-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/planner-dev-list
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFIiNZ3MGnpIbeahxwRAnv/AJ9pzr0QDZ69pG529njn6l7JGxWzJACeOld0 fazOnjfreHiLiSOWjmpoUY8= =uxz7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----