Re: Discussion as to whether community based external plugins could/should be in the official source-tree
Bastien Nocera <[email protected]> Sat, 02 Nov 2013 01:05:32 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.apps.rhythmbox.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1383350732.7371.6.camel@nuvo> |
On Sat, 2013-11-02 at 00:02 +0000, Donagh Horgan wrote: > My plugins (comprising three of the list David compiled) are GPLv3. > I'm not sure of the technical implications of including these in the > distribution, but it would be extremely convenient from both a user > and plugin maintenance perspective. I suppose the question is whether > the change would shift an equivalent (or larger) responsibility on to > the Rhythmbox developers and whether they'd be happy to accept it. Distributions wouldn't be able to ship it, because the licenses are incompatible.