Re: Discussion as to whether community based external plugins could/should be in the official source-tree

Hmmm...well that means it also depends on which licenses plugin developers
would have to use. Is there a complete list available?
On Nov 2, 2013 12:05 a.m., "Bastien Nocera" <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Sat, 2013-11-02 at 00:02 +0000, Donagh Horgan wrote:
> > My plugins (comprising three of the list David compiled) are GPLv3.
> > I'm not sure of the technical implications of including these in the
> > distribution, but it would be extremely convenient from both a user
> > and plugin maintenance perspective. I suppose the question is whether
> > the change would shift an equivalent (or larger) responsibility on to
> > the Rhythmbox developers and whether they'd be happy to accept it.
>
> Distributions wouldn't be able to ship it, because the licenses are
> incompatible.
>
>

_______________________________________________
rhythmbox-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/rhythmbox-devel