Re: GNOME2
josh lucas <[email protected]> Wed, 24 Jul 2002 19:54:55 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.darwin |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wednesday, July 24, 2002, at 07:43 PM, Robert Damm wrote: > Hello Josh, > > I have successfully installed GNOME 1.4 without the slightest hiccup by > using FINK. I'll go into GNOME 2 in a second - bear with me. Note that > with > FINK if you have already installed X11 in some other way that there is a > "dummy" X11 package so that fink doesn't tell you of the dependency > between > GNOME libraries + X etc. Install the dummy X package if you have > downloaded > X11 from somewhere else. Yeah, I was able to get GNOME 1.4 without any problems from fink so for some reason, the panel's icons aren't showing up.. Such is life I guess... > > That aside, FINK installed GNOME + X both from binaries and from source > without a hitch. Note that compiling from source takes longer. But if > you > want frustrations such as I've experienced over the last month, try to > compile KDE or GNOME2 on your iBook. I just won't happen easily. This > is due > to library location problems, nonstandard compiler routines, etc. Some > members of this mailing list have talked about using GNOME 2 but have > not > yet shared how they got the darned thing installed! I've been fighting > with > it for weeks now. > > I wish I could be of more help; but seriously prepare yourself for > compilation hell - the UNIX underneath OSX is not the most standard in > the > universe and will cause you trouble; especially if you don't understand > the > cryptic 'make' errrors that gcc spits out. Feel free to send the errors > you > get to the list and I will try to help you get through it, but I'm new > too > :). Yup, I'll give it a shout in the next couple of days. I'm currently at a conference and while wireless bandwidth is provided, compiling time isn't.. thanks again! josh