Re: Matrix IRC bridge considered harmful

Alexandre Franke <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnome.desktop
Message-ID <CAJ-e=JBjS53yHsxx7BE1o2Rw=Cu=b2zi_fRa1MtMdHLrPQ-+gA@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 8:07 PM Zander Brown <[email protected]> wrote:

> I've used the matrix bridge for years now (I'm generally only on irc "for
> real"
> to fix things after the bridge does crazy things like de-op me or change my
> nick without warning...)
>
> Matrix isn't perfect. matrix.org, the main "homeserver", regularly has
> high
> latency further exacerbated by the bridge. Hopefully hosting our own would
> avoid that
>

Yes, it would help a lot both ways:
* we wouldn’t be hurt by performance issues on the matrix.org HS (apart
from federation issue for people “from there”)
* we would reduce the load on the matrix.org HS

My concern would be the "federal" nature of matrix where people don't need a
> gnome.org specific chat account to join a room. Whilst there are a lot of
> arguments for this I'm increasingly convinced it's an anti-feature
> especially
> if we want to enforce CoC (which, of course, we do)
>

That was a concern for Mozilla too. I don’t know the details, but they have
a solution for that it seems. See e.g. the Community safety section in the
[annoucement](
https://discourse.mozilla.org/t/synchronous-messaging-at-mozilla-the-decision/50620
).

-- 
Alexandre Franke
GNOME Hacker

_______________________________________________
desktop-devel-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.