Re: Proposal for an Events Code of Conduct and Policy Referendum

Alexandre Franke <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnome.foundation.general
Message-ID <CAJ-e=JCnLZdT-k=_qWHOndKjjsFZ93MeG3nQWFHjw9_xhsqu9w@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 10:54 PM, meg ford <[email protected]> wrote:
> I do not completely agree with Allan's explanation here. While I have been
> involved in the current discussions about the CoC proposal, it has been as a
> member of the Board, not as a member of the WG. I was not involved in the
> final draft of the document as a member of the WG. As Allan stated, many of
> us had stopped participating in the WG before the final draft was finished
> because Ben's behavior had become unacceptable.

Did you mean to quote a specific part of Allan’s email? Because my
email was about what happened during the time when discussions were
still within the WG (and the conflict that emerged from it) and yours
is about what happened after that, so you replying to my email this
way is misleading.

-- 
Alexandre Franke
GNOME Hacker & Foundation Director
_______________________________________________
foundation-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.