Re: Proposal for an Events Code of Conduct and Policy Referendum

Hi,
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 4:54 PM, Alexandre Franke <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Did you mean to quote a specific part of Allan’s email? Because my
> email was about what happened during the time when discussions were
> still within the WG (and the conflict that emerged from it) and yours
> is about what happened after that, so you replying to my email this
> way is misleading.
>

That's actually not true. Allan was saying (correct me if I'm wrong, Allan)
that he and Neil finishing the final draft without Ben was "direct response
to
repeated unacceptable behaviour on Ben's part." By that point in time
Allan, Ben and Neil were the only members of the group who were active. In
my email I was saying that most of us became inactive in response to the
atmosphere in the working group, before Ben was excluded from the final
drafting.

In addition, I was saying that I don't agree with Allan that Ben was the
only member of the working group who was not included in the final drafting
(both before and after the time that the discussions were still happening
within working group). I can't speak for other WG members, but I was not
included in the discussion surrounding the final drafting process that Neil
and Allan completed. The only time I have seen the final draft has been as
a member of the Board.

Does that clarify things?

Meg

>
> --
> Alexandre Franke
> GNOME Hacker & Foundation Director
>

_______________________________________________
foundation-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list