Re: [[glade--]Re: glademm2]

Christof Petig <[email protected]> wrote:
> Murray Cumming wrote:
> > Christof Petig <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 
> >>Murray Cumming wrote:
> >>
> >>Did you mean 'Is gtk 2.0 compatible with glademm?'
> >>
> >>The answer:
> >>
> >>Both coexist (!) peacefully (and no more, you still need gtk 1.2).
> >>
> >>glademm is not yet compatible with glade-2 (which uses gtk+2.0) (first 
> >>on my TODO list)
> > 
> > 
> > In case it´s any incentive, when glademm2 appears I will be giving it
much
> > more attention. I´m not convinced that code-generation is all that useful
for
> > development, but it seems like a great way to have a kind of interactive
> > tutorial.
> 
> It will never appear ;-)
> 
> the next glademm version will handle gracefully both glade and glade-2 
> files and emit gtkmm 1.2 or gtkmm 1.3 code depending on the version 
> present (or the command line parameter given)
> 
> Do you think of this as bad idea? The overhead for supporting both file 
> types is neglectable.
> [Of course glademm2 _sounds_ so new and polished.]
>    Christof

If it´s easy then support both. But I don´t think anybody would mind if you
just support gtkmm2 and glade2. It´s probably less work for you. And less
options means less silly bug reports.


Murray Cumming
[email protected]
www.murrayc.com