Re: [Telepathy] rework of the UI
Eitan Isaacson <[email protected]> Wed, 13 Sep 2006 11:58:25 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.gossip.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1158173905.5685.23.camel@localhost> |
On Wed, 2006-09-13 at 17:13 +0200, Richard Hult wrote: > Hi, > > I just took a very quick look at the patch: > > * Please try to avoid whitespace-only changes > > * Use g_object_set() instead of setting up a gvalue and using > g_object_set_property (and when using g_object_set, don't cast the object). > > * g_value_transform looks suspicious, is that right? don't you just want > to copy the value? > > * What's the reason for having the function that returns a hash table > with all params? I just had an idea: instead of returning a hashtable, we could have a function called gossip_account_params_foreach() - One more step in hiding the implementation without having to iterate over all the parameters a million times. > > * The quark args should not be called param_name, since they are not > names, but quarks, however... > > * ...what's the reason really to have a datalist, when a hashtable would > work just as fine and probably be simpler and less code? > > /Richard >