***UNCHECKED*** Meson and Autotools, or only Meson?
Kjell Ahlstedt via gtkmm-list <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.gtkmm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
These *mm packages can now be built either with Meson or with Autotools: * mm-common * libsigc++-2.0, libsigc++-3.0 * glibmm-2.4, glibmm-2.66 * pangomm-1.4, pangomm-2.44 * (gtkmm-documentation-3,) gtkmm-documentation-4 I've put gtkmm-documentation-3 in parentheses because there is no released tarball with Meson support, it's only in the git repo. Some underlying C packages, such as glib and gtk4, have dropped Autotools support. Shall we do the same, where possible? I think at least one released tarball must contain both Meson support and Autotools support before Autotools support can be dropped, or else https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-build-meta/ will have problems. Correct me, if I'm wrong here. At the moment all of the listed packages use Meson when they are built with jhbuild, but only mm-common does so when it's built with gnome-build-meta. Regards Kjell _______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list