Re: ***UNCHECKED*** Meson and Autotools, or only Meson?
Pavlo Solntsev via gtkmm-list <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.gtkmm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 2020-03-25 at 18:49 +0100, Kjell Ahlstedt via gtkmm-list wrote: > These *mm packages can now be built either with Meson or with > Autotools: > > mm-common > libsigc++-2.0, libsigc++-3.0 > glibmm-2.4, glibmm-2.66 > pangomm-1.4, pangomm-2.44 > (gtkmm-documentation-3,) gtkmm-documentation-4 > I've put gtkmm-documentation-3 in parentheses because there is no > released tarball with Meson support, it's only in the git repo. How about ninja dist? https://mesonbuild.com/Creating-releases.html > > Some underlying C packages, such as glib and gtk4, have dropped > Autotools support. Shall we do the same, where possible? > Make sure meson works in parallel with autotools and eventually drop the support. > I think at least one released tarball must contain both Meson support > and Autotools support before Autotools support can be dropped, or > else https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-build-meta/ will have > problems. Correct me, if I'm wrong here. > > At the moment all of the listed packages use Meson when they are > built with jhbuild, but only mm-common does so when it's built with > gnome-build-meta. > > Regards > Kjell > > _______________________________________________ > gtkmm-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list