Re: Plans for 2.8 - GNOME Managed Language Services?

Mike Kestner <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnome.language-bindings,gmane.comp.gnome.desktop
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Fri, 2004-03-26 at 11:44, Murray Cumming wrote:

> Maybe more runtime introspection (listing objects and their methods, and
> their parameters, for instance) might help maintainers of bindings for
> dynamic languages, such as python. If so, let's have it. I'd like to
> hear from them.

Gtk# would benefit from the addition of introspection for virtual class
methods.  I'm referring to the non-signal methods on the class structure
that can be overridden.  Things like GtkContainer::forall().

Basically, we need g_signal_override_class_closure and
g_signal_chain_from_overridden for non-signal virtual methods.

-- 
Mike Kestner <[email protected]>

_______________________________________________
language-bindings mailing list  [email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/language-bindings
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.