Re: New Bindings modules (was Re: GNOME 2.7/2.8 Proposed Schedule)

Andrew Sobala <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnome.language-bindings
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue, 2004-05-04 at 23:39 +0000, Murray Cumming wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-05-04 at 15:44 -0400, Ross McFarland wrote:
> > Murray Cumming said:
> > > We are now in sync with the GNOME schedule:
> > > http://www.gnome.org/start/2.7/
> > > There is no extra, different, GNOME Bindings schedule.
> > 
> > so does this mean that bindings api freeze and release the at same time as the
> > libraries themselves?
> 
> Yes, now we are GNOME. That should not be a problem because we are not
> starting late this time. And you will, of course, be allowed to deal
> properly with any last-minute changes in the underlying libraries.

Woo!

Of course, following the GNOME schedule means that maybe, in a blue-sky
future, one day, Desktop modules will be able to rely on the Bindings
and the Platform instead of just the Platform.
-- 
Andrew Sobala <[email protected]>
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD4DBQBAmA5hBv9K3NCDvFYRAoNOAJi9F8y99nU2ULi63PWFNa8ddLF6AJ44InkU
DgBFASxfVf6ZaXWD7cdSgg==
=YFyN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.