RE: No GTK+ 2.6 in GNOME 2.8

Murray Cumming <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnome.language-bindings
Message-ID <1083714198.6468.104.camel@murrayc_debian>
On Tue, 2004-05-04 at 16:02 -0400, Ross McFarland wrote:
> Murray Cumming said:
> > On Tue, 2004-04-20 at 07:29 -0400, Jeffrey Morgan wrote:
> >> The java team had hoped to enhance our gdk layer by adding
> >> many of the missing methods.  Will you be oposed to these
> >> additions?
> >
> > OK, so I think the best thing to do for this is to just add "unstable"
> > to your tarball names. something-2.4.5unstable.tar.gz looks a bit
> > strange but at least nobody can claim that it is stable.
> >
> > When making unstable releases with 2.4 names, please do make it
> > absolutely clear that they contain API that could change and that distro
> > packagers should not update their stable packages with them.
> >
> > You might want to start at some high number such as 2.4.10unstable. That
> > would give you room to do maintenance releases of your stable branches,
> > with numbers like 2.4.2.
> >
> > Or, does anyone have a better suggestion yet?
> 
> <beatting of dead horse>
> as i've said before (i/we think) the idea of synced version numbers are more
> problems than they are worth. with gtk2-perl we get to do all of our unstable
> work under 1.05x (1.04x is the stable series.) people don't seem to have a
> problem figuring out that they need to get the higest version number.
> </beatting of dead horse>

Yes, that is a perfectly valid point of view. But there are pros and
cons for both ways of doing it. People can get confused pretty easily,
and I hope that this is the simplest thing overall - it seems to be what
most people expect.

> i guess this won't work as well for the groups who are doing seperate bindings
> versions for seperate releases of glib/gtk+/etc, but that's a whole nother
> dead horse that i won't bother beatting at the moment. :)
> 
> just my opinions nothing more nothing less.
> -rm
> _______________________________________________
> language-bindings mailing list  [email protected]
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/language-bindings
> 
-- 
Murray Cumming
[email protected]
www.murrayc.com


_______________________________________________
language-bindings mailing list  [email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/language-bindings
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.