Re: LGPL vs. GPL confusion in reference manual?

Wow, good catch. It's LGPL'd. I'll change that wording ASAP.

On 4/20/07, Carl Worth <[email protected]> wrote:
> All the source files I checked in the librsvg implementation indicate
> they are licensed under the GNU Library General Public License (LGPL),
> but the reference manual contains this text (in rsvg-docs.sgml):
>
>         The GNOME SVG Library (RSVG) is library for rendering SVG and
>         SVGZ files. RSVG is released under the GNU General Public
>         License (GNU GPL), which allows for flexible licensing of
>         client applications.
>
> Is that just a typo? Especially the part about "flexible licensing"
> suggests that the paragraph was intended to read as:
>
>         The GNOME SVG Library (RSVG) is library for rendering SVG and
>         SVGZ files. RSVG is released under the GNU Library General
>         Public License (GNU LGPL), which allows for flexible licensing
>         of client applications.
>
> -Carl
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
> _______________________________________________
> Librsvg-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/librsvg-devel
>
>
>


-- 
Counting bodies like sheep to the rhythm of the war drums.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/