Curious answer...
"Richard Norman" <[email protected]> Mon, 10 May 2004 12:54:33 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.mono.swt.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--=__Part83A251E9.1__= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit This was a curious answer, there may have been some things behind the scenes that I might have missed, but why this particular answer? Is it just a matter of time and effort, or is it more of the fact to put quality into the pieces you have? Just curious cause I thought that #WT was a pretty good idea. I myself would not know where to begin or how to test, but I was intrigued by your answer to the question in this manner. Richard Norman Software Developer http://www.jazzynupe.net/blog/ ********************************************************* Message: 2 Date: Thu, 06 May 2004 14:06:05 +0200 To: [email protected] From: Christoph Wille <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Sd-mono-port] Is SharpWT dead? At 09:25 PM 5/5/2004, you wrote: >I haven't followed progress in quite a while, but it looks as if there >hasn't been any anyways? Can someone give the list an update? The #develop team is no longer working on #WT, which it looks like means that no one else is working on it any longer. Also, the #develop team will very likely never again attempt to make #develop cross-platform. Our plans are for a #develop 1.0 release on .NET 1.1 (with a debugger coming later), and switching to .NET 2.0 once Beta 1 is available this summer. Chris Senior Project Wrangler, #develop --=__Part83A251E9.1__= Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Description: HTML <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"> <META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1400" name=GENERATOR></HEAD> <BODY style="MARGIN: 4px 4px 1px; FONT: 12pt Arial"> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>This was a curious answer, there may have been some things behind the scenes that I might have missed, but why this particular answer? Is it just a matter of time and effort, or is it more of the fact to put quality into the pieces you have?</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Just curious cause I thought that #WT was a pretty good idea. I myself would not know where to begin or how to test, but I was intrigued by your answer to the question in this manner.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Richard Norman</DIV> <DIV>Software Developer</DIV> <DIV><A href="http://www.jazzynupe.net/blog/">http://www.jazzynupe.net/blog/</A></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>*********************************************************</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Message: 2<BR>Date: Thu, 06 May 2004 14:06:05 +0200<BR>To: <A href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</A> <BR>From: Christoph Wille <<A href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</A>><BR>Subject: Re: [Sd-mono-port] Is SharpWT dead?</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>At 09:25 PM 5/5/2004, you wrote:<BR>>I haven't followed progress in quite a while, but it looks as if there<BR>>hasn't been any anyways? Can someone give the list an update?</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>The #develop team is no longer working on #WT, which it looks like means <BR>that no one else is working on it any longer.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Also, the #develop team will very likely never again attempt to make <BR>#develop cross-platform. Our plans are for a #develop 1.0 release on .NET <BR>1.1 (with a debugger coming later), and switching to .NET 2.0 once Beta 1 <BR>is available this summer.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Chris<BR>Senior Project Wrangler, #develop<BR></DIV></BODY></HTML> --=__Part83A251E9.1__=--