Re: GnuCash page on GO site
Derek Atkins <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.office.general,gmane.comp.gnome.apps.gnucash.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Jody Goldberg <[email protected]> writes: >> * Gnucash has a lot of custom widgets -- all of these need to be ported >> * Gnucash uses a number of libraries/apis which don't exist in gnome-2: >> - ghttp > Have a look at gnetwork Nah, we just plan to rip out the dep. Gnucash doesn't need to be a web browser ;) >> - guppi > This is unmaintined and has been replaced by the engine in > libgoffice. It is not as all powerful as guppi was and the api is > still in flux, but it should get the job done. It's flavour is part > way between guppi-tank and guppi. Is the API documented somewhere? (URL?) Is there a "porting guppi apps to libgoffice" doc somewhere? Unfortunately I know nearly nothing about guppi -- it's code that was written well before I came onboard. >> * The gtkhtml api is drastically different.. And we're not sure whether >> we should be using gtkhtml-2 or gtkhtml-3 > That depends. gtkhtml-3 == gtk2-ified gtkhtml > gtkhtml2 was a rewrite that is less functional in some areas (does > not include editing) but had solid accessibility support. Sounds like gtkhtml-3 is an easier bet for us. >> I'm sure I can come up with other issues, too. But the number of >> differences is extremely large, so the port is taking a significant >> number of man-months to complete. Considering we don't get many man-hours >> of development time every month, it's taking a while. If we had >> full-time developers it would probably help significantly. > > Ain't that the truth. Which is why to my mind, sharing the work > load is an imperative. Provided sharing the work load doesn't add to the work load.. -derek -- Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB) URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH [email protected] PGP key available