Re: new highcontrast widgets?

Willie Walker <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnome.themes
Message-ID <[email protected]>
I'm not sure exactly what the a11y POV was.  I'm guessing it may have 
been more than John Kodis' response:

http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2002-January/msg00431.html

"The WM close button is a more difficult control to access using 
standard keyboard navigation techniques."

I've recently started a discussion on the Orca users list regarding this 
topic.  My goal was to just have screen reader users provide their 
thoughts and then filter things to this discussion.

http://mail.gnome.org/archives/orca-list/2007-November/msg00053.html

So far, it's a mixed bag of responses.  I'm not sure I see any 
polarization one way or the other.

The 2002 desktop-devel-list thread above was very enlightening to me. 
IMO, the sample size was rather small and I'm not sure I actually 
followed the path that led to the conclusions.

However, while I was aware of 'instant apply' for things like a Palm 
Pilot, I wasn't aware the concept had been used in these dialogs. 
Instead, I always expect to have to do some sort of closure action to 
make sure my settings are applied.  At the same time, I usually assume I 
can always press "Escape" or something to revert things back to the way 
they were before I opened the dialog.  This gives me the freedom to 
experiment and not have to remember every last thing I changed to put 
things back to they way they used to be.

In addition, pressing "Close" feels good to me.  Pressing Alt+F4 always 
feels like a hammer to me:  I'll usually reopen the dialog to make sure 
the settings "took".  But, that's just one user's opinion.  :-)  If the 
hip way of the 21st century is 'less is more', I can work to adapt.

Will

Calum Benson wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 09:05 +0100, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
>> Just found a old discussion on desktop-devel-list regarding this.
>> http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2002-January/msg00412.html
> 
> Told you we'd been arguing about it for a while :)  Although I don't see
> the a11y POV represented in that thread, which is really what drove the
> final decision IIRC.
> 
> Cheeri,
> Calum.
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.