Re: FINAL: All backgrounds proposals
Andreas Nilsson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.themes |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Andrea Cimitan wrote: > Il giorno dom, 26/08/2007 alle 12.43 +0200, Lapo Calamandrei ha > scritto: > >> I'm not sure your rationale against nature wallpapers works, It's >> mostly a personal taste issue. I like the garrett leaf, and it can >> nicelly work as a wallpaper since it's a macro photo and it doesn't >> have so many details, but it needs some touchups. Anyway space may be >> an issue and so if we want to go for an abstarct bg I'd choose the 3rd >> or the 4th in your selection. Andreas, what do you think? >> >> > Absolutely not just tastes. See the 8 points to support abstract wallz. > Usability, customizable colors (when users will change their gtk theme > in the future), originality, space, resizable/scalable, long-term usage > (months/years), and gnome HIG. > > A comparison of the two wallz with various colors (see how tango colors > look better with the tango blue of the abstact wallpaper): > http://img171.imageshack.us/img171/8793/schermatawa8.png > http://img171.imageshack.us/img171/2973/schermata2zx8.png > Hi Andrea! http://www.ingral.com.br/~vdepizzol/temp/CRW_9008-2.jpg This is the one I'm pushing into trunk (the process seems to be a bit hard though, fixes need to go into different modules and stuff...). Sorry for any confusion. - Andreas