Re: snapshots switching branches

Rodd Clarkson <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnome.ximian.snapshots
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue, 2002-09-17 at 10:43, jacob berkman wrote:
> > As always, I'm happy to test, but my desktop is a production one, so it
> > needs to (mostly ;-]) work.
> 
> well, if it's a production box you shouldn't be testing on it in the
> first place...
> 
> but a goal of the 2.2 development process is to not destabilize, and to
> keep things working.

The think that makes open source so great, and so stable is that people
are willing to test on their production desktops, and not in a sterile
testing environment.  For example, Microsoft recent beta testing
required a clean install of Windows, and then installation of the
development tool with NO other software installed on the box.  Upgrade
involved reinstalling the OS and software.  This might test whether the
software works with Windows, but it doesn't tell you too much about what
all those 'other' applications might do the environment.

Am I suggesting that others should do this?  NO! - but it's great if
they do because it give developers feedback that's real world.

I'm more than happy to put up with the occasional downtime (and even one
or two lost files) to help get this real world testing to developers,
but in turn it is nice to have some idea if the latest build is going
bite my arse badly. ;-]

Looks like I can continue testing!

-- 
Redfish Bluefish [Creative]
Phone : 03 9879 5944
Fax   : 03 9879 5833

"I mean heck, it's even got a graphical configurator, so you don't 
 have to use the command line to hose your system anymore."

				-- George (Gnome Developer)


_______________________________________________
gnome-2-snapshots maillist  -  [email protected]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/gnome-2-snapshots
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.