Re: gnome-2-snapshots digest, Vol 1 #23 - 18 msgs

UNSUBSCRIBE ME !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
DAMN

----- Original Message -----
From: <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 4:00 PM
Subject: gnome-2-snapshots digest, Vol 1 #23 - 18 msgs


>
> Send gnome-2-snapshots mailing list submissions to
> [email protected]
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the web, visit
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/gnome-2-snapshots
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> [email protected]
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> [email protected]
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
> "Re: Contents of gnome-2-snapshots digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Re: Alternatives to Metacity? (Kurt)
>   2. Re: Alternatives to Metacity? (Michael A. Koziarski)
>   3. Re: Alternatives to Metacity? (Rodd Clarkson)
>   4. Re: Alternatives to Metacity? (Kurt)
>   5. Re: Alternatives to Metacity? (Ben de Luca)
>   6. Re: Alternatives to Metacity? (markus hammer)
>   7. Re: Gnome2 stuff (Rodd Clarkson)
>   8. Tired with the XP search Facility, Check this out
([email protected])
>   9. Re: Tired with the XP search Facility, Check this out (jacob berkman)
>   10. Re: key repeating? (Damian Ivereigh)
>   11. using gnome-2-0 branch (jacob berkman)
>   12. Error installing new gnome-2 snapshot (J. Gardner Biggs)
>   13. Re: Error installing new gnome-2 snapshot (Michael Lamoureux)
>   14. Re: Error installing new gnome-2 snapshot (Rodd Clarkson)
>   15. Re: Error installing new gnome-2 snapshot (spider jerusalem)
>   16. Re: using gnome-2-0 branch (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?C=E9dric?= Marcone)
>   17. Error installing new gnome-2 snapshot (20020926 as well) (J. Gardner
Biggs)
>   18. Re: Error installing new gnome-2 snapshot (20020926 as well) (Martin
Felker)
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 1
> Subject: Re: Alternatives to Metacity?
> From: Kurt <[email protected]>
> To: Rodd Clarkson <[email protected]>
> Cc: Gnome2 Snapshots List <[email protected]>
> <[email protected]>
> Date: 22 Sep 2002 18:24:02 -0700
>
> On Sun, 2002-09-22 at 16:39, Rodd Clarkson wrote:
> > On Sat, 2002-09-21 at 19:25, Kurt wrote:
> > > So far I have tried Red Hat 7.3 with Ximian gnome-smapshots, Red Hat
> > > Null, and Mandrake 9.0rc2 and while they look nice with the new icon
> > > sets they just aren't good enough yet to justify an upgrade.
> >
> > If your just upgrading for the icons, you're missing the whole point of
> > Gnome-2.  Speed, greater consistency, anti-aliased text, accessibility
> > and a host of other features are what make Gnome-2 truely worth the
> > upgrade.
>
> No, I wouldn't upgrade for the icons, I get the point of Gnome-2. I am
> just finding support for Metacity only a bit of a drag.
> >
> > > Don't get me wrong, I like the theory behind the move to Gnome-2 and
> > > Metacity. I have almost always exclusively used Gnome for my desktop.
> > > However, the way it stands, right now, I think I would rather stick to
> > > Gnome-1.4 or even switch to a KDE desktop. Even Gnome
> > > http://www.gnome.org/softwaremap/projects/Metacity states of Metacity,
> > > "Originally an experiment, it's now turning out to be halfway
usable..."
> > > Unfortunately it still seems to be still halfway usable.
> >
> > Metacity isn't ever going to be the bloated mess that sawfish was.  I
> > stopped using Enlightenment because sawfish was light weight, and I've
> > stopped using sawfish because metacity has done the same.
>
> I come from the days where anything over 16k was bloated. I did not have
> all that much of a problem with bloat for either Sawfish or
> Enlightenment. However, that said, I can also see a need to have
> something a bit more streamlined, especially for the business market.
> >
> > The reason why you don't see sawfish in the packages is because support
> > for sawfish sucked and nothing was getting done.  The guy who maintains
> > sawfish clearly isn't that interested in maintaining sawfish, and the
> > code is so convoluted that it would be faster to rewrite than to
> > comprehend.
> >
> > Metacity documentation could use some cleanup - things aren't as bad as
> > they seem.  On the plus side, Metacity uses GTK2 so it no only responds
> > to UI changes in Gnome-2, but it means that Accessibility and other
> > features are part of the Window Manager.
>
> Documentation? From my point of view Metacity came out of nowhere, and
> now, suddenly, it is not only the default window manager, it is now
> difficult for the average user to switch to a different one. Newbies
> just switching to Linux will not even know that they are available.
>
> >
> > > I would sure like to see Gnome-2 support for other window managers
> > > besides Metacity, at least until Metacity is *much* more mature. If
> > > stuck with just Metacity I might sit out upgrading for a while.
> >
> > Gnome-2 isn't Metacity dependent.  You can download sawfish from
> > elsewhere and use it, just don't expect any fixes any time soon.
> >
> > You could also write you're own WM for Gnome-2, is you would like.
>
> Yes, I guess I could, I can even write a script or caplet to switch my
> desktop window manager for me. I have been taken a bit aback by just how
> suddenly Metacity has been adopted and the others apparently tossed
> aside.
> >
> > > I know Sun withdrew development help for Sawfish. What about other
> > > window managers besides Metacity? Anyone have any experience with
> > > Gnome-2 and Sawfish, Enlightenment, IceWM, Window Maker, etc.; either
> > > good or bad?
> >
> > Sun withdrew developent help for sawfish because they needed a A11Y
> > compliant WM and sawfish couldn't cut it.  Metacity on the other hand
> > could and other features, like Xinerama, would be easy to add.
> >
> > > Will Metacity be "finished" by the release of the current beta distros
> > > with Gnome-2?
> >
> > Redhat seem to think it's ready enough.
> >
> > Gnome has never been reliant on a single WM, or at least not for some
> > time.  Any WM can be made gnome compliant and there's no guarantee that
> > metacity will remain the default.  Time will tell.
>
> I am not as hostile toward Metacity as I might seem. If Linux is to
> survive it will undoubtedly need to make some more hard decisions that
> will lob off some or other nice piece in favor of the greater
> advancement toward world domination. I just think it would be nice for
> the commercial distributions to make the transition a little less harsh
> and at least include window manager selection utility, even if it is
> tucked away somewhere a naive user is not likely to find it.
>
> >
> > > Anyone with profound insight to the Linux desktop wars please fill me
> > > in.
> >
> > No profound insight, just a little time listening to chatter. ;-]
>
> So far, your listening and insightful thought and comment has helped
> give me a bit more insight to why certain decisions have been made. I
> hope we don't get too much of a backlash from developers outside of
> commercial Linux interests that may not agree with some of the business
> oriented decisions. http://www.linuxisforbitches.com./
>
> >
> >
> > Rodd
> > --
> > Rodd Clarkson <[email protected]>
> > redfish bluefish [creative]
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > gnome-2-snapshots maillist  -  [email protected]
> > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/gnome-2-snapshots
> >
>
> Thanks Rodd,
> Kurt
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 14:32:49 +1200
> From: "Michael A. Koziarski" <[email protected]>
> To: Kurt <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Alternatives to Metacity?
>
> > No, I wouldn't upgrade for the icons, I get the point of Gnome-2. I am
> > just finding support for Metacity only a bit of a drag.
>
> I use sawfish with my gnome-2 desktops.  Works fine.   While I'm missing
> out on a11y and i18n I don't care as I speak english and am not disabled.
>
>
>
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 3
> Subject: Re: Alternatives to Metacity?
> From: Rodd Clarkson <[email protected]>
> To: Kurt <[email protected]>
> Cc: Gnome2 Snapshots List <[email protected]>
> <[email protected]>
> <1032744251.1738.48.camel@xmax>
> Organization: redfish bluefish [creative]
> Date: 23 Sep 2002 13:36:54 +1000
>
> On Mon, 2002-09-23 at 11:24, Kurt wrote:
> > > Metacity documentation could use some cleanup - things aren't as bad
as
> > > they seem.  On the plus side, Metacity uses GTK2 so it no only
responds
> > > to UI changes in Gnome-2, but it means that Accessibility and other
> > > features are part of the Window Manager.
> >
> > Documentation? From my point of view Metacity came out of nowhere, and
> > now, suddenly, it is not only the default window manager, it is now
> > difficult for the average user to switch to a different one. Newbies
> > just switching to Linux will not even know that they are available.
>
> Metacity has been in development since before Gnome-2 was released.  I
> trifled with it off an on from an early point switching between sawfish
> and metacity until metacity's limited feature set was enough, and
> metacity was so much faster that sawfish wasn't worth it (for me).
>
> Metacity was developed to scratch an itch, and it turns out there were
> quite a few people itching.  Sawfish totally lacked support, and people
> yearned for a windows manager they could contribute too.  Metacity was
> in the right place and time to fill the niche.
>
> Switching between windows managers should be easy.  Metacity supports
> the ICCCM --replace flag which "will exit if another WM claims it, and
> can claim it from another WM if you pass [it]"  so if other windows
> managers support this (and they should -
> http://www.freedesktop.org/standards/wm-spec/) then switching desktop
> shouldn't be a problem. Of course, a nice tool for this would be, well,
> nice. ;-]
>
> > > You could also write you're own WM for Gnome-2, is you would like.
> >
> > Yes, I guess I could, I can even write a script or caplet to switch my
> > desktop window manager for me. I have been taken a bit aback by just how
> > suddenly Metacity has been adopted and the others apparently tossed
> > aside.
>
> Yeah, it was a little sudden, but as the initial release of Gnome-2.0.0
> come up, developers started to realize just how hard getting changes to
> sawfish was.  There was some talk of dropping sawfish at that time, but
> metacity wasn't ready.
> > >
> > > Gnome has never been reliant on a single WM, or at least not for some
> > > time.  Any WM can be made gnome compliant and there's no guarantee
that
> > > metacity will remain the default.  Time will tell.
> >
> > I am not as hostile toward Metacity as I might seem. If Linux is to
> > survive it will undoubtedly need to make some more hard decisions that
> > will lob off some or other nice piece in favor of the greater
> > advancement toward world domination. I just think it would be nice for
> > the commercial distributions to make the transition a little less harsh
> > and at least include window manager selection utility, even if it is
> > tucked away somewhere a naive user is not likely to find it.
>
> I didn't get the feeling you were hostile towards metacity - I just
> assumed you were wanting answers ;-]
>
> It would be nice to have more choice (isn't this what Open Source is
> about to some degree?).  However, sawfish is a DEAD end, so until
> someone steps up to the plate with a alternative, choice is going to be
> limited.
>
> > > > Anyone with profound insight to the Linux desktop wars please fill
me
> > > > in.
> > >
> > > No profound insight, just a little time listening to chatter. ;-]
> >
> > So far, your listening and insightful thought and comment has helped
> > give me a bit more insight to why certain decisions have been made. I
> > hope we don't get too much of a backlash from developers outside of
> > commercial Linux interests that may not agree with some of the business
> > oriented decisions. http://www.linuxisforbitches.com./
>
> Glad to listen.  Everyone's got a right to a wrong opinion... ;-]
>
>
> Rodd
>
> --
> Rodd Clarkson <[email protected]>
> redfish bluefish [creative]
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 4
> Subject: Re: Alternatives to Metacity?
> From: Kurt <[email protected]>
> To: "Michael A. Koziarski" <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> <[email protected]>
> <1032744251.1738.48.camel@xmax>  <[email protected]>
> Date: 23 Sep 2002 00:42:49 -0700
>
> On Sun, 2002-09-22 at 19:32, Michael A. Koziarski wrote:
> > > No, I wouldn't upgrade for the icons, I get the point of Gnome-2. I am
> > > just finding support for Metacity only a bit of a drag.
> >
> > I use sawfish with my gnome-2 desktops.  Works fine.   While I'm missing
> > out on a11y and i18n I don't care as I speak english and am not
disabled.
>
> I think I may do the same until Metacity matures a bit more. The bloat
> in Sawfish is not a big issue with me and I am quite addicted to edge
> flipping while working with four viewports. I would, however, like to
> see a built in window manager switching utility. If not, I guess I will
> have to craft my own, if someone else doesn't. The one thing I love
> about Linux and open source is choice.
>
> Thanks,
> Kurt
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > gnome-2-snapshots maillist  -  [email protected]
> > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/gnome-2-snapshots
> >
>
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 5
> Subject: Re: Alternatives to Metacity?
> From: Ben de Luca <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> <[email protected]>
> <1032744251.1738.48.camel@xmax> <[email protected]>
> <1032766975.1738.102.camel@xmax>
> Date: 23 Sep 2002 18:03:51 +1000
>
> edge fliping is some thing I realy realy realy miss. its about the only
> feature that i think is important enough to be added.
>
> On Mon, 2002-09-23 at 17:42, Kurt wrote:
> > On Sun, 2002-09-22 at 19:32, Michael A. Koziarski wrote:
> > > > No, I wouldn't upgrade for the icons, I get the point of Gnome-2. I
am
> > > > just finding support for Metacity only a bit of a drag.
> > >
> > > I use sawfish with my gnome-2 desktops.  Works fine.   While I'm
missing
> > > out on a11y and i18n I don't care as I speak english and am not
disabled.
> >
> > I think I may do the same until Metacity matures a bit more. The bloat
> > in Sawfish is not a big issue with me and I am quite addicted to edge
> > flipping while working with four viewports. I would, however, like to
> > see a built in window manager switching utility. If not, I guess I will
> > have to craft my own, if someone else doesn't. The one thing I love
> > about Linux and open source is choice.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Kurt
> >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > gnome-2-snapshots maillist  -  [email protected]
> > > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/gnome-2-snapshots
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > gnome-2-snapshots maillist  -  [email protected]
> > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/gnome-2-snapshots
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 6
> Subject: Re: Alternatives to Metacity?
> From: markus hammer <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> <[email protected]>
> <1032744251.1738.48.camel@xmax> <[email protected]>
> <1032766975.1738.102.camel@xmax>
> <[email protected]>
> Date: 23 Sep 2002 11:45:15 +0200
>
> On Mon, 2002-09-23 at 10:03, Ben de Luca wrote:
> > *This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm)
Pro*
> > edge fliping is some thing I realy realy realy miss. its about the only
> > feature that i think is important enough to be added.
>
> i will miss the grouping of windows. meta-window-properties or how it
> was called was pretty nice. so you could make all windows of the same
> programm group act as if you where on  a mac. and gimps windows wouldnt
> be cluttered all over xterms etc. -> just had to click on a gimp window
> to raise all gimp windows.
> sawfish asfaik was also the only window manager where with a bit of
> fiddling you could make dialog windows apear on top of anything else,
> even when the app was unfocused.
> i really hate it when i loose dialog windows.
>
> cheers markus
>
> --
>  Markus Hammer
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 7
> Subject: Re: Gnome2 stuff
> From: Rodd Clarkson <[email protected]>
> To: Brian Fahrlander <[email protected]>,
> Gnome2 Snapshots List <[email protected]>
> Organization: redfish bluefish [creative]
> Date: 24 Sep 2002 09:24:57 +1000
>
> On Mon, 2002-09-23 at 18:16, Brian Fahrlander wrote:
> > >
> > > The prompt doesn't appear, but the cursor indicates that it is there.
> > > If I type, the text appears as a solid block, but on pressing enter,
the
> > > command (or whatever I typed) appears, and is run.
> >
> >     I'm not on the list, but I'm having this, too.  Also be aware that
if you're running something like trafshow and/or iptraf, it'll stop showing
things in realtime.  Man, it's really broken.  Borked?  :)
> >
> >     I've been getting my releases via Apt for Redhat, off the sunnmore
server....but I fear that someone's fallen asleep at the switch; I've not
seen any releases of anything for WEEKS.  I'm aware of the bleeding
edge....I'm just getting tired of these exact same errors for so long...
> >
> >     How's it go now, for you?
>
> Still the same.
>
> So you know, just after this release of the snapshot Gnome-2.0.2 was
> released and the ximian snapshots have moved to Gnome-2.1.x track.  As a
> result the snapshots are in need of some TLC and this is why we aren't
> seeing any new snaps.
>
>
> Rodd
> --
> Rodd Clarkson <[email protected]>
> redfish bluefish [creative]
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 22:34:14 +0100
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Tired with the XP search Facility, Check this out
>
> http://www.findfilesxp.com
>
> This program is up to 100 times faster than the XP search, with much more
functionality.
>
> It has many more features like multiple string searches (With replace
options), and can prieview Movies, Pictures and ascii (Text) files, Can
search selected drives and folders (and NOT search too).
>
> Its also free to try, and only $10 to  buy.
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 18:58:22 -0400
> Subject: Re: Tired with the XP search Facility, Check this out
> From: jacob berkman <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
>
> On Tuesday, September 24, 2002, at 05:34  PM, [email protected]
> wrote:
>
> > http://www.findfilesxp.com
> >
> > This program is up to 100 times faster than the XP search, with much
> > more functionality.
>
> for some reason, non-subscribed addresses were allowed to send to this
> list.
>
> i've turned that off, so these spams shouldn't get through any more.
>
>   - jacob
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 10
> Subject: Re: key repeating?
> From: Damian Ivereigh <[email protected]>
> To: Steven Cote <[email protected]>
> Cc: Ben de Luca <[email protected]>, [email protected]
> <1032535059.1221.10.camel@gamecat>
> Organization: Cisco Systems Inc
> Date: 25 Sep 2002 09:41:00 +1000
>
>
> --=-tPWbg3RzbTbn9DgdA9PK
> Content-Type: text/plain
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> Would it make sense to class that as a bug and log it in bugzilla. Given
> that this could happen to anyone who did an upgrade, it would make sense
> to make gnome a little more resilient to these sort of config problems.
> For example if it finds the rate and delay tags missing to set them to
> some reasonable values.
>
> Damian
> =20
> On Sat, 2002-09-21 at 01:17, Steven Cote wrote:
> > > has any one else had truble with key repetitions? I thought it was
> > > completely broken till last night, then it mysteriously started
working=
>  .
> > >=20
> > > Is there a work around?
> >=20
> > I've had that problem. If key repeat is enabled, all it does is type a
> > key twice rather than waiting a moment before repeating the key stroke?
> >=20
> > The problem as far as I can see was an absence of settings in GConf.
> > When I fired up GConf, and found that under
> > apps/desktop/gnome/peripherals/keyboard I was missing the "rate" and the
> > "delay" tags. Fiddling with the sliders from the keyboard preferences
> > dialog made those tags auto-magically appear and then key repeat seemed
> > to work just fine.
> >=20
> > That was my experience at any rate.
> >=20
> >  - scote
> >=20
> > _______________________________________________
> > gnome-2-snapshots maillist  -  [email protected]
> > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/gnome-2-snapshots
> --=20
> Damian Ivereigh <[email protected]>
> Cisco Systems Inc
>
> --=-tPWbg3RzbTbn9DgdA9PK
> Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
> Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
>
> iD8DBQA9kPgM1cH4aSTnpo8RAgISAKDvRUXQSJAQJWn0gpgTq2jhBBjOBwCgmowd
> ySragL20k4MZy9tt66MYRhc=
> =Jgg0
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> --=-tPWbg3RzbTbn9DgdA9PK--
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 11
> Subject: using gnome-2-0 branch
> From: jacob berkman <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Organization: Ximian, Inc.
> Date: 25 Sep 2002 12:44:24 -0400
>
> i've moved the builds to push the -2-0 builds for rhl 7.3, and changed
> the 7.2 box to build from the -2-0 branches until HEAD starts getting
> some green builds.
>
> new packages should be in RC later today.
>
> jacob
> --
> in the future we're all going to regret this period in music where our
> tastes were determined by 11 year old girls and wrestling fans.
>   -- moby
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 12
> Subject: Error installing new gnome-2 snapshot
> From: "J. Gardner Biggs" <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Organization:
> Date: 25 Sep 2002 19:12:25 -0500
>
>
> file /usr/share/pixmaps/control-center.png from install of
> control-center2-2.0.2.92.0.200209251237-0.snap.ximian.1 conflicts with
> file from package control-center-1.4.0.5-10.ximian.2
>
> anybody else get this error?
>
> should I just delete the file and re-run the installation?
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 13
> Subject: Re: Error installing new gnome-2 snapshot
> From: Michael Lamoureux <[email protected]>
> To: "J. Gardner Biggs" <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> <[email protected]>
> Organization:
> Date: 25 Sep 2002 21:13:40 -0400
>
> I got the same error 12 times today.  It's good to know it's not just
> me.  I've moved/renamed/deleted the file and it has not helped.  I wish
> I could help but I am FNG.
>
> On Wed, 2002-09-25 at 20:12, J. Gardner Biggs wrote:
> > file /usr/share/pixmaps/control-center.png from install of
> > control-center2-2.0.2.92.0.200209251237-0.snap.ximian.1 conflicts with
> > file from package control-center-1.4.0.5-10.ximian.2
> >
> > anybody else get this error?
> >
> > should I just delete the file and re-run the installation?
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > gnome-2-snapshots maillist  -  [email protected]
> > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/gnome-2-snapshots
> --
> Michael Lamoureux <[email protected]>
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 14
> Subject: Re: Error installing new gnome-2 snapshot
> From: Rodd Clarkson <[email protected]>
> To: "J. Gardner Biggs" <[email protected]>
> Cc: Gnome2 Snapshots List <[email protected]>
> <[email protected]>
> Organization: redfish bluefish [creative]
> Date: 26 Sep 2002 10:26:58 +1000
>
> I saw this too.
>
> Deleting the actual file won't make any difference because the problem
> is a conflict between
> control-center2-2.0.2.92.0.200209251237-0.snap.ximian.1 and
> control-center-1.4.0.5-10.ximian.2.
>
> You can always --force the install of the package from the command line
> (this is what I did) but if your using RedCarpet you may not be able to
> do this.
>
> You may also be able to rpm -e control-center, but this might cause
> grief as you won't be able to configure gnome-1.x apps.
>
> Forcing the install would be better because the file is only a png so
> it's not going to be critical (just ascetic ;-]).
>
>
> Rodd
>
>
>
> On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 10:12, J. Gardner Biggs wrote:
> > file /usr/share/pixmaps/control-center.png from install of
> > control-center2-2.0.2.92.0.200209251237-0.snap.ximian.1 conflicts with
> > file from package control-center-1.4.0.5-10.ximian.2
> >
> > anybody else get this error?
> >
> > should I just delete the file and re-run the installation?
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > gnome-2-snapshots maillist  -  [email protected]
> > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/gnome-2-snapshots
> --
> Rodd Clarkson <[email protected]>
> redfish bluefish [creative]
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 15
> From: "spider jerusalem" <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected], "J. Gardner Biggs" <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 01:17:13 -0500
> Subject: Re: Error installing new gnome-2 snapshot
>
> > I got the same error 12 times today.  It's good to know it's not just
> > me.  I've moved/renamed/deleted the file and it has not helped.  I wish
> > I could help but I am FNG.
> >
> > On Wed, 2002-09-25 at 20:12, J. Gardner Biggs wrote:
> > > file /usr/share/pixmaps/control-center.png from install of
> > > control-center2-2.0.2.92.0.200209251237-0.snap.ximian.1 conflicts with
> > > file from package control-center-1.4.0.5-10.ximian.2
> > >
> > > anybody else get this error?
> > >
>
> I got same error, I removed the control-center-1.4* and after that
everything was ok, but dunno if this is a bug meaning that is removing the
old package really needed....
>
> hopey
>
> > > should I just delete the file and re-run the installation?
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > gnome-2-snapshots maillist  -  [email protected]
> > > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/gnome-2-snapshots
> > --
> > Michael Lamoureux <[email protected]>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > gnome-2-snapshots maillist  -  [email protected]
> > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/gnome-2-snapshots
> >
>
> --
> __________________________________________________________
> Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Mail.com
> http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 16
> Subject: Re: using gnome-2-0 branch
> From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?C=E9dric?= Marcone <[email protected]>
> To: jacob berkman <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Date: 26 Sep 2002 12:04:49 +0200
>
> I updated and gnome2 seems faster (really subjective, no bench...), I
> love it.
>
> 2 issues tough :
>
> - SVG support in nautilus seems broken (emblems and scalable gorilla
> theme). Each piece of svg seems to be compressed on the y axis.
>
> - Music preview doesn't work anymore (mp3).
>
> Thank you for the hard work.
> --
> Cédric Marcone
> MDEO Lyon
> Centre de Technologie
> (+33) 4 72 07 92 93
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 17
> Subject: Error installing new gnome-2 snapshot (20020926 as well)
> From: "J. Gardner Biggs" <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Organization:
> Date: 26 Sep 2002 07:33:00 -0500
>
> On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 01:17, spider jerusalem wrote:
> > > I got the same error 12 times today.  It's good to know it's not just
> > > me.  I've moved/renamed/deleted the file and it has not helped.  I
wish
> > > I could help but I am FNG.
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2002-09-25 at 20:12, J. Gardner Biggs wrote:
> > > > file /usr/share/pixmaps/control-center.png from install of
> > > > control-center2-2.0.2.92.0.200209251237-0.snap.ximian.1 conflicts
with
> > > > file from package control-center-1.4.0.5-10.ximian.2
> > > >
> > > > anybody else get this error?
>
> This happend on the 20020926 build as well this A.M.
>
> ./out
>
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 18
> Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 10:44:43 -0400
> From: Martin Felker <[email protected]>
> To: "J. Gardner Biggs" <[email protected]>
> CC: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Error installing new gnome-2 snapshot (20020926 as well)
>
> J. Gardner Biggs wrote:
>
> >On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 01:17, spider jerusalem wrote:
> >
> >
> >>>I got the same error 12 times today.  It's good to know it's not just
> >>>me.  I've moved/renamed/deleted the file and it has not helped.  I wish
> >>>I could help but I am FNG.
> >>>
> >>>On Wed, 2002-09-25 at 20:12, J. Gardner Biggs wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>file /usr/share/pixmaps/control-center.png from install of
> >>>>control-center2-2.0.2.92.0.200209251237-0.snap.ximian.1 conflicts with
> >>>>file from package control-center-1.4.0.5-10.ximian.2
> >>>>
> >>>>anybody else get this error?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >
> >This happend on the 20020926 build as well this A.M.
> >
> >./out
> >
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >gnome-2-snapshots maillist  -  [email protected]
> >http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/gnome-2-snapshots
> >
> >
> >
> Yes that error happened to me except I was using
> control-center-1.5.13.-1.ximian.2.   No really major problem after using
> rpm -Uvh
>
> control-center2-2.0.2.92.0.200209251237-0.snap.ximian.1 --force.   Upon
reboot everything seems to be OK - at least the desktop is still there which
was my greatest fear from preivous snapshots.
>
> Is this actually a branch of gnome-2.1x and if so will that substantially
delay any "formal" presentation of Ximian Gnome-2 (ie from a full
installation from the website??
>
> Marty Felker
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-2-snapshots mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/gnome-2-snapshots
>
>
> End of gnome-2-snapshots Digest
>


_______________________________________________
gnome-2-snapshots maillist  -  [email protected]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/gnome-2-snapshots